Minimum distance for overtaking cyclists being considered, with drivers FACING A FINE for non-compliance

The Department for Transport (DfT) is investigating new road rules, with a minimum distance for overtaking cyclists being considered in an attempt to get people to choose to cycle.

Minimum distance for overtaking cyclists being considered, with drivers FACING A FINE for non-compliance

The review will look at the case for a new offence equivalent to causing death or serious injury when cycling, as well as road safety issues relating to cycling including the rules of the road, public awareness, key safety risks and the guidance and signage for all road users.

One possible area the government could consider is setting a minimum distance for drivers overtaking cyclists.

Currently the Highway Code is vague about the issue, stating that drivers should give cyclists “plenty” of space and “as much room as you would when overtaking a car”, but ministers have previously said the introduction of a mandatory minimum passing distance is a possibility.

The introduction of a mandatory minimum passing distance is a possibility

Just last month, Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Hertfordshire Road Policing Unit launched Operation Velo to catch drivers not giving cyclists enough room.

The operation saw motorists escorted to a check point to be educated on the optimum distance to pass a cycle (1.5m) with consideration given to the appropriateness of the road environment and speed taken.

In some cases motorists could be prosecuted for careless or inconsiderate driving and face a fine of £100 and three points on their licence.

The officers also looked at cycle rider behaviour, addressing any who put themselves at risk by disobeying traffic signs and red lights, failing to use lights in the hours of darkness and cycling recklessly.

new offence covering death by dangerous cycling.

Dangerous and careless cycling

Meanwhile, in line with the Cycle Safety Review, cyclists themselves could also come under increased scrutiny with the introduction of a new offence covering death by dangerous cycling.

This recommendation comes following the death of Kim Briggs, a mother of two, who was knocked down and killed by a cyclist riding a fixed-gear bicycle which had been modified to have no front brakes.

The review is part of a plan to get more people onto their bikes and out of cars, but with nearly 100 cyclists killed every year in the UK and 3,000 seriously injured these figures are seen as a major stumbling block.

Nick Lloyd, road safety manager at the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), said: “We believe that improving safety would not only reduce the number of cyclist casualties, but would also encourage and enable more people to cycle more often.

“It would help people who want to cycle but are deterred from doing so currently because they think it is not safe enough, and would also help to prevent an increase in cycling being followed by an increase in cyclist casualties.”

Previous Post Next Post

Your Comments